Pages

Saturday, October 26, 2019

Pol 3211 October 26, 2019 Online Lecture

For the finals period, we will be using the following readings in sequence.

As participation in this online session.  Each student is expected to comment in the comment box his/her block/surname, first name middle initial.  Please log-in using his/her official UST google account.  Part of being in the professional world means that you have a professional email account.  A professional-looking email such as name@gmail.com or rmcastillo@gmail.com, or castilloronald@gmail.com are in a way acceptable.  But an institutional email e.g. rmcastillo@ust.edu.ph trumps the others because it attests to your institutional affiliation.  This is also the reason why I used the blog for today instead of using Blackboard.  It forces you to use your gmail account on two things: logging in and downloading from the Gdrive.

For the finals period, we will be covering the following: Comparative Politics, Political Theory and Philosophy, International Relations, and Public Policy Administration.  These are but a few of the sub-disciplines of political science.  The perspectives or approaches to political science all relate to each of the sub-disciplines.  As is, I've been considering you, and have been thinking of trimming down your burden.  Hence, you will see at the end of this online post the selected readings for this period.  You will notice that I've melded Public Policy and Administration with two other disciplines.  Be warned, Landman's is quite technical.  Rice and Stewart's is mathematical, Youatt's is philosophically weird.  

Comparative politics is the experimental science of political science.  It studies political institutions and behavior.  It is through this sub-discipline that we, political scientists, can analyze, ponder, and comment on everyday politics.

Political Theory and Political Philosophy helps us understand the different ideologies and the foundations of political thinking.  By the way, there is a difference between political theory and philosophy.

International Relations is where political science scholars enter the world of diplomacy.  Where the intrigues in local politics are grander, being on an international scale.  This does not simply introduce you to being diplomats, but it introduces you to be state managers.

Public Policy and Administration is a separate degree (AB Pub Ad) but we also study it as a sub-discipline because being statesmen and women, the technicalities of policymaking and policy administration are both important in the delivery of and maintenance of the salus populi.

Among the reading's is Robert's Rules of Order which is the seed from which all parliamentary rules across many institutions across the world are based.  I want you to learn it, and work as one (each block) to simulate a parliamentary body, i.e. court, senate, House of Representatives, a cabinet meeting, etc.   Parliamentary Simulation will start on November 16, 2019.  I will preside in the first session, but each class must be able to do it on their own in the next two.  The theme per session will be International Relations for Session 2, and Political Philosophy and Public Policy on Session 3.  For the first, it will just be a dust-up so that we can start the gears going.  It's going to be a review and an initial practice, the theme will be Philippine Institutions and Electoral Behavior.    Parliamentary Simulation will be held on November 22 and 23.  It will be graded on the following criteria:  (a) complete class participation, (b) masterful use of the 4 classes of motions (the four classes were used within the two day simulation, (c) maximization of the theme, (d) observation of parliamentary rules and behavior, and (c).  Each category will be given one of three marks: 1 for mediocre quality of output, 3 for average quality, and 5 for excellent, total of 25 marks.

Be ready to recite at least 10 Latin maxims when we get back.  Create your own Bend and Snap and do it after you recite.  That will be a 15 point recit.  The Latin maxims are actually called Brocards in law school.  They are Latin expressions that date back to as ancient as the time of Cicero, but they are not all from Cicero.  They eventually were called brocards because of Fr. Burchard who compiled several and made use of them.

Enjoy the vacation, balance it with your readings and coordinating with blockmates.

See you in a week.

Valar morghulis.

Readings:

Parliamentary Rules and Procedure


Comparative Politics

Putting the Science in Political Science

Political Theory and Philosophy, and Public Administration

Power, Pain, and the Interspecies Politics of Foie Gras

International Relations and Public Policy
U.S. - Philippine Defense Alliance

Monday, October 14, 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: October 17, 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: October 17, 2019

Pink Round

Adjudicators:  PM and DPM of Green, Deputies of Yellow, PM and LO of Blue,

PM and LO should text me their chosen motion by 9:00 a.m. today.  I will reply with the finalized one.

1.  TH will return the Philippine educational system to its better former self.
2.  TH will police the Pacific ocean against China.
3.  TH will ask the world bank for debt relief.

Saturday, October 12, 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: October 15, 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: October 15, 2019

Orange Round

Adjudicators:  Members of the Pink Round who have not yet adjudicated along with Leaders of the Opposition of Green, Yellow, Blue, and Gray.


PM and LO should text me their chosen motion by 9:00 a.m. today.  I will reply with the finalized one.

1.  THBT the global village exists due to international capitalist success.
2.  THBT the new world shrinks enough to allow the proliferation of universal morals.
3.  THBT the international body of states should be governed by one political body.

Monday, September 30, 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: October , 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: October 1, 2019

Gray Round

Adjudicators:  Government Whips from Green, Yellow, Blue, and Orange


PM and LO should text me their chosen motion by 9:00 a.m. today.  I will reply with the finalized one.

1.  THBT the world village is an illusion.
2.  THBT all states should adopt a democratic form of government.
3.  THBT human rights should be made second in comparison to the survival of the state.

Friday, September 27, 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: October 1, 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: October 1, 2019

Blue Round

Adjudicators:  Members of the Government and Members of the Opposition from Green, Yellow, Gray, and Orange


PM and LO should text me their chosen motion by 9:00 a.m. today.  I will reply with the finalized one.

1.  THBT the UN should become militarized.
2.  THBT the 5 Permanent Members of the Security Council harm rather than protect the world.
3.  THBT there should be a world government..

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

Pol 3213 - 2Pol3 - Prelim Paper


For the prelim paper, you need only the following:


Format

2-3 pages of content (references is a separate page) totalling 4
Font - Palatino Linotype size 12
1" margin top and bottom
.5 left
1.5 right
1.5 spacing
no cover page
make use of headings, sub-headings stretegically

check out the format of the two articles below.

5 pt mark for grading, 1pt deducted for every error.

Content

Abstract 

No more than 200 - 250 words.
Keywords:  must be strategic, the keywords are used to 1) align the article to a particular area of political science.  2) Make the article easily searchable by those doing research on that topic.  The 2nd reason helps you get cited by bridging you to readers.
In sequence:
Must have a hook.
Must briefly tell the reader what the topic is about.
Must inform the reader of the theory to be used.
Must inform the reader of the proposed method to be used.
Must inform the reader of: 1) in a proposal, which your paper is, informs the reader of what your hypothesis or thesis statement is.  And 2) if the paper is already finished, informs the reader of what your findings are.

10 marks, 1-2 pts deducted for every error.

Introduction

Must have the following:

Background on the issue  

To hook and inform the reader.
Background on the locale or subject of study.  This depends on your topic.  What is the actual feature of your study?  The phenomenon?  An idea (theory, concept)? The actor?  The location?  Sometimes, even the time period.  e.g.  Phenomenon - impeachment of Chief Justice Corona.   Idea - local autonomy.  Actor - Hong Kong protesters.  Location - San Fernando Pampanga.  You choose which, because the choice is linked to what you are writing about.
The background must have sources.  Sometimes what you write is because of your own experience or interest, or observation.  Write it in such a way to signpost this to the reader.  Some materials in your RRL can be used here (not all though).  The objective and significance are also 3-4 paragraphs. 

10 marks, 1-2 pts deducted for every error.

Related Literature and Theory

Balance this in proportion to the background.
Should be only a few paragraphs.  2 - 3 will do, you may extend to 4 if needed.
Should show the relationship of major studies done in relation to what you are doing now.  You are comparing them.  Grouping them on which are near the same topics, and at the same time, feature what makes each individual unique (the contribution of the article to the body of knowledge, usually the findings or method used).  And lastly, identify the gap.  The gap is the missing are which has not been researched on, and you are filling the gap with what you are writing.  At the end, these studies should contribute to a theory which supports your thesis statement.  There should be a direct statement of what the theory is.  e.g.  Kant -  government systems can affect war or peace, and democracy as a government system is the one that leads to peace.

10 marks, 1-2 pts deducted for every error.

Method

Must answer the following in narrative paragraphs (see samples in links):
Why is your Quanti-Quali or why Quali-Quanti?  (this is your method)
What is your quali design? (this is your design)
What location and who to participate? (subject and study site)
Why that place?  Why them?  (called selection criteria)
How do you intend to get the data?  (data gathering method, there can be more than one)

IMPORTANT:  
Just rephrase my ethical considerations in the Localizing Zero Waste sample paper.
NO mode of analysis - I haven't taught you that yet.  But just to clarify, in a proposal, there should be one.

10 marks, 1-2 pts deducted for every error.

45 Marks in total for this submission.

For plagiarism check, you will submit ms word copies via eleap on the same day of the hard copy submission.  Notification will be made through class president.  5 marks deducted for every valid match exceeding 3%

Samples



Monday, September 23, 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: September 26, 2019

1Phl1 Contemporary World: Debate Motions: September 26, 2019

Yellow Round

Adjudicators:  Deputy Prime Ministers from Green, Blue, Gray, and Pink


PM and LO should text me their chosen motion by 9:00 a.m. today.  I will reply with the finalized one.

1.  TH must ask the World Bank for debt forgiveness.
2.  TH will withdraw from the GATT.
3.  THBT the Breton Woods System was made for the benefit of developed countries alone.