1BES2 PGC

My apologies class, but no section of the article will be passed over.  Pls. review all sections and prep for graded recitations come Tuesday.

Political Theory Syllabus

2Pol2 and 2POL3

My apologies for the very long delay.

Here's the class syllabus.Print or save in your digital gadget.

Pls download readings and read those in UNIT 2.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/185915890/Obe-Syllabus-Format-Rcastillo-Pol-Theory

5 pt Metric

Update for Grade Metric

Originally, all my classes use this 10 pt metric.Grade Measurement

Pts. Metric for all Graded Activities and Student Outputs

1-2 = Very unprepared, very flawed output

3-4 = Unprepared, flawed output

5-6 = Average output with minor flaws/errors

7-8 = Good output

9-10 = Exceptional output

 

If we use 5 pts.  It will simply follow

 

Grade Measurement

Pts. Metric for all Graded Activities and Student Outputs

1 = Very unprepared, very flawed output

2 = Unprepared, flawed output

3 = Average output with minor flaws/errors

4 = Good output

5 = Exceptional output

Parade of Philosophers 2POL2 and 2POL3

Rubric system for the presentation:

Group Organization/Preparation: 5 pts.

Individual Eloquence: 5 pts.
Individual Costume and Props: 5 pts.
Individual Research: 5 pts.
Individual Choice of Summarized Content: 10 pts

Parade of Paragons for 3POL1 and 3POL2

Rubric system for the presentation:

Group Organization/Preparation: 5 pts.
Individual Insight: 10 pts.
Individual Eloquence: 5 pts.
Individual Costume and Props: 5 pts.
Individual Research: 5 pts.

1POL3 POL 201 Unlikely Finals Batch 2

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 5:15 p.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. If you were a political philosopher, narrate how you formulate a political philosophy.  Narrative must emphasis the essence of what makes political philosophy as different from political theory.
2. As a political scientist, If you were going to study international relations between the Philippines and China, which perspective will you use? Justify your answer.  Justification must also include Political Institutions in the Philippines that will be involved in such a situation.

1POL2 POL 201 Unlikely Finals Batch 2

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 5:15 p.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. If you were a political philosopher, narrate how you formulate a political philosophy.  Narrative must emphasis the essence of what makes political philosophy as different from political theory.
2. As a political scientist, If you were going to study international relations between the Philippines and China, which perspective will you use? Justify your answer.  Justification must also include Political Institutions in the Philippines that will be involved in such a situation.

1POL1 POL 201 Unlikely Finals Batch 2

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 5:15 p.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. If you were a political philosopher, narrate how you formulate a political philosophy.  Narrative must emphasis the essence of what makes political philosophy as different from political theory.
2. As a political scientist, If you were going to study international relations between the Philippines and China, which perspective will you use? Justify your answer.  Justification must also include Political Institutions in the Philippines that will be involved in such a situation.