1POL3 POL 201 Unlikely Finals Batch 2

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 5:15 p.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. If you were a political philosopher, narrate how you formulate a political philosophy.  Narrative must emphasis the essence of what makes political philosophy as different from political theory.
2. As a political scientist, If you were going to study international relations between the Philippines and China, which perspective will you use? Justify your answer.  Justification must also include Political Institutions in the Philippines that will be involved in such a situation.

1POL2 POL 201 Unlikely Finals Batch 2

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 5:15 p.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. If you were a political philosopher, narrate how you formulate a political philosophy.  Narrative must emphasis the essence of what makes political philosophy as different from political theory.
2. As a political scientist, If you were going to study international relations between the Philippines and China, which perspective will you use? Justify your answer.  Justification must also include Political Institutions in the Philippines that will be involved in such a situation.

1POL1 POL 201 Unlikely Finals Batch 2

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 5:15 p.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. If you were a political philosopher, narrate how you formulate a political philosophy.  Narrative must emphasis the essence of what makes political philosophy as different from political theory.
2. As a political scientist, If you were going to study international relations between the Philippines and China, which perspective will you use? Justify your answer.  Justification must also include Political Institutions in the Philippines that will be involved in such a situation.

3POL2 Removal Exam

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 10:15 a.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. Create a post-behavioral conclusion with regards to multi-party political experience of Tunisia and Syria.
2. Create a behavioralist conclusion incorporating Wakili’s (2009) ideas on Islamic Thought in Nigerian politics.

1POL3 POL 201 Unlikely Finals

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 10:15 a.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. Explain one political thesis discussed/mentioned in class, provide the proofs, anti-thesis, and practical applications of such political idea.
2. Explain 3 basic political science concepts that will be useful to you in the future.  These must be from the photocopies and must not be among those discussed in class.

1POL2 POL 201 Unlikely Finals

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 10:15 a.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. Explain one political thesis discussed/mentioned in class, provide the proofs, anti-thesis, and practical applications of such political idea.
2. Explain 3 basic political science concepts that will be useful to you in the future.  These must be from the photocopies and must not be among those discussed in class.

1POL1 POL 201 Unlikely Finals

Instructions:

• Answer via the comments.  Begin with your name followed by PERMIT/PERMIT NUMBER (surname, first name: permit number).
• Deadline of answers posting is at 10:15 a.m. October 12, 2013.
• If a student is unable to access the net, a new set of questions will be available at 4:00 p.m. October 12, 2013.  New questions sets will get more difficult to discourage intended delays.  Those with no net access at this time have the time to further review.
• Discuss intelligibly in 6-7 sentences. 
• No evil genius.
• Write in the jargon of the discipline. 
• Follow detailed requirements in each item.
• No copy pasted, verbatim from handout answers.  Provide YOUR OWN OBJECTIVE discussion.

Note: If I can read your minds as you guess during recitation and detect plagiarized works in your papers, don't you think it also applies here.

Points:

5 for manner of discussion, and 5  for content.

Range of points follows:

5 = impressive (no flaws, uncommon answer);  

4 = common answer with no flaws; 3 = most common / average answer with flaws;

2 = presence of several / essential flaws;

1 missed the point but showed knowledge of the topic;

0 = answer did not deal with the question/item/task (evil genius).

Items:

1. Explain one political thesis discussed/mentioned in class, provide the proofs, anti-thesis, and practical applications of such political idea.
2. Explain 3 basic political science concepts that will be useful to you in the future.  These must be from the photocopies and must not be among those discussed in class.

The Aristos List

The Privilege is granted upon the following 1POL this 1st Sem. A.Y. 2013-2014:

Adora, Gabriel
Andal, Thomas
Bato, katrina
De Jesus, Laurena
Bejarin, Joanne
Belgira, Marielle
Besario, Kenny
Boco, Eva
Salenga, James

Belgica, Jhee Ann
Garcia, Thomas
Gordola, Ethan
Lee, Zarina
Magno, Ma. Traceza
Mendoza, Samantha

Martinez, Juan Teodoro
Pinlac, Christine
Tabunda, Hannah
Taguinod, Carla
Santos, katrina
Uy, Mariel
Valencia, Ariadney
Natividad, Genesis

Congratulations.

Continue in doing your best.

Don't forget to have your permits signed, else INC (incomplete on grades).

Pol 201 Supplement

This will serve as query post for all 1POL regarding questions on Political Science as a Profession.

I will entertain clarification inquiries here via the comments.  Please note that inquiries must not be attempt to get easy answers.

Good luck on the Final exams of 1st sem 2013-2014.

Lessons from Asia and Africa

One of the important reasons why we compare states is to widen options in the manner of governing our own polity, or to suggest solutions to the problems of others.

For this online discussion, your task is to provide in the comments by providing a lesson for Philippine development from comparing two states from units 5, 6, and 7.

Analysis can either be: post-behavioral analysis of politics; or a neo-institutional analysis of government.

Sample compare governments of South Africa and Nigeria, and provide a neo-institutional lesson for the Philippines.